Research & Scholarly Integrity
This page is your guide to resources for teaching responsible conduct of research, scholarship, and creative activities.
The Resources (see gray bar on the left) contains powerpoint presentations on each of the (federal) Office of Research Integrity topics—with explanatory notes—that can be used as assigned readings and/or as the foundational material for guided discussions. You may use the PPT presentations and/or modify them by adding specific material for your discipline (e.g. specific information on authorship practices for your discipline). Case studies, additional readings, and links to useful websites are coming soon.
- Avoiding Unintentional Plagiarism (see page 24 of document for permission to use)
- Turn It In Anti-plagiarism software at MSU
- Responsible Conduct of Research Workshop Series - 2015-2016 Registration
- Guidelines for Graduate Student Advising and Mentoring Relationships AND Guidelines for Integrity in Research and Creative Activities
- Revocation of Graduate Degrees
The long awaited release of "The Lab: Avoiding Research Misconduct" is now available for viewing on the ORI web site. The video simulation allows users to assume the role of a graduate student, post-doc, research administrator, or PI and make decisions that affect the integrity of research.
RESEARCH and SCHOLARLY INTEGRITY: what it means for the QUALITY of YOUR research and scholarship:
Why This Is Important
“The scientific enterprise is built on a foundation of trust. Society trusts that scientific research results are an honest and accurate reflection of a researcher’s work. Researchers equally trust that their colleagues have gathered data carefully, have used appropriate analytic and statistical techniques, have reported their results accurately, and have treated the work of other researchers with respect. When this trust is misplaced and the professional standards of science are violated, researchers are not just personally affronted – they feel that the base of their profession has been undermined. This would impact the relationship between science and society. ...
Established researchers have a special responsibility in upholding and promulgating high standards in science. They should serve as role models for their students and for fellow researchers, and they should exemplify responsible practices in their teaching and their conversations with others. They have a professional obligation to create positive research environments and to respond to concerns about irresponsible behaviors. Established researchers can themselves gain a new appreciation for the importance of professional standards by thinking about the topics presented in this guide and by discussing those topics with their research groups and students. In this way, they help to maintain the foundations of the scientific enterprise and its reputation with society.”
Ralph J. Cicerone, Charles M. Vest, and Harvey V. Fineberg. 2009. Preface to “On Being a Scientist – A Guide to Responsible Conduct in Research.” The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. 63pp.